Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neudesic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 23:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Neudesic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing here is notable. Fastest growing = not yet notable, and neither is being in the top 500 in a  specialized field   DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, outside of significant coverage in one book, published by a non-reliable publisher (Packt) the subject has not received significant coverage in non-primary reliable sources. Most news sources of the subject are PR releases, and are not considered significant coverage when attempting to determine notability. Therefore failing WP:GNG & WP:CORP, deletion is the proper course of action.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:06, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems this was "refunded" recently, but continues to be ignored. Fails WP:N.  --HighKing (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Also, page creator and primary contributor are two SPA accounts with a possibly promotional agenda.Dialectric (talk) 08:36, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.