Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuer Auftrag Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. apparently just part of a game; no sources for importance. (If it were real, a firm of this importance would have had good sources)  DGG ( talk ) 17:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Neuer Auftrag Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

The Neuer Auftrag Institute have never existed. SevenSapiens (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 29.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  15:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Nominator may have a point. The article itself is completely unreferenced, and I was unable to verify any part of it. I found nothing at Google News Archive searching in English and German. The only thing I found was in Portuguese, and the translated version drips of conspiracy theory, claiming that this company operated secretly in Brazil and other countries. "It never was, say, public knowledge of the people, she always remained hidden behind the coats of politicians creating medicines, formulas, sometimes creating with the help of other companies. The Neuer Auftrag Institute was founded in the 70s by Dierk Adalricus, whose man disappeared as soon as his company folded." No way should this be a Wikipedia article. --MelanieN (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * BTW the article was created in 2008 by an WP:SPA named User:Neuerauftrag and has been basically unedited ever since. --MelanieN (talk) 17:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * BTW there are no articles about this subject at the German or Portuguese wikipedias. --MelanieN (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * My mistake, the Portuguese wikipedia contains an article Instituto Neuer Auftrag, which was created at the same time as this one by the same user, Neuerauftrag, and was proposed for deletion at the same time as this one by the same nominator, SevenSapiens. --MelanieN (talk) 17:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, and this is helpful: according to the nomination statement at the Portuguese wikipedia, "Artigo criado por alguém que estava fazendo um Alternate reality game. O Instituto Neuer Auftrag nunca existiu." Translation: "Article was created by someone who was doing an alternate reality game. The Neuer Auftrag Institute never existed." Based on this, is there some way this can be speedied? --MelanieN (talk) 19:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.