Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neunt of Axelrod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0 [ talk ] 16:16, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Neunt of Axelrod
Hoax content and no google hit. RadioActive 10:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable, possible hoax. 's first article was deleted (see Articles for deletion/Akhilleus Aksakov) and another was replaced with a redirect but I have nominated it for WP:RFD.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 10:57Z 
 * Assuming we delete these, how do we tell the Japanese Wikipedia about them? The usual en-w templates don't seem to work there.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 11:03Z 
 * Delete, obvious hoax, or non-notable fiction. Lukas 12:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable at best. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:55, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax. Smerdis of Tlön 15:00, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- possibly a hoax, certainly fiction. --Simon Cursitor 15:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax, fiction. Can be moved to BJAOD. --Terence Ong Talk 15:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even the Commons template is empty. --KJPurscell 15:59, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. Edgar181 16:04, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifialbe, for a start. Stifle 01:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.