Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuralyzers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  redirect to Men in Black (film). Any editor is free to merge pertinent material. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 04:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Neuralyzers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable enough to have their own page. Freikorp (talk) 02:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Men in Black (film) - not notable independently of the motion picture and its sequel. The movie article explains the device adequately for our purposes. B.Wind (talk) 17:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Men in Black (film) unless someone comes up with some independent sources. Jclemens (talk) 22:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see a first AfD for this. Anyone know why this is a "2nd" nom? Jclemens (talk) 06:15, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * My mistake, got it confused with something else. Freikorp (talk) 08:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Pick one... Merge to either Men in Black (film), Men in Black: The Series, or Men in Black II... or even all three... where the topic has context. While the term does have usage in multiple reliable sources, all such are in reference to the device as used in the various MIB films (naturally):, [  Time now to discuss just which article to merge it to.. or even if all three should proably have the item mentioned-in-context. [[User:MichaelQSchmidt| Schmidt, ]] MICHAEL Q. 21:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd nominate redirecting it to the first film, first mention of the device, makes sense to me. Freikorp (talk) 08:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.