Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuro-Architecture, The Role of Neuroscience in Architecture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 06:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Neuro-Architecture, The Role of Neuroscience in Architecture

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NEO, in the words of the article itself: "The term Neuro-Architecture is a word only recently gaining credibility and attention within the public and the Architectural community. " Term is not in general use or otherwise notable. Dennis Brown (talk) 00:20, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

I do not agree with the posted comment as it is unclear what the quantifiable definition of "in general use" is or why this article is not notable. Please provide clear measurable criteria to when a term crosses the acceptable usage threshold. Any term such as Neuro-Architecture will start life at some point and its acceptance will grow. The presence of verifiable resources indicates that this term is in existence beyond my article and therefore should not be subject to speedy deletion. Dennis Brown, who are you and what is your area of expertise? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoria.E.Norman (talk • contribs) 11:34, 27 October 2011 (UTC) — Victoria.E.Norman (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Victoria E. Norman, who are you and... oh wait, you're an SPA who put a blathery OR essay on Wikipedia. I see scattered use of the term, most of them clearly treating it as a neologism. EEng (talk) 13:03, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not an article. Doesn't even explain what the subject is. WP:NOTESSAY, WP:OR. References don't establish notability. One of the refs doesn't mention architecture. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 13:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.