Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:13, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

NeuroSpine Surgery Research Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article PRODded with reason "Drummed up puff piece created by COI editor. No independent references. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG". Article dePRODded by IP (apparently the article creator) stating "My COI: I was a student of A/Prof Mobbs and NSURG. I did not receive any payment from NSURG and I am not an employer of NSURG by any means. The reason of writing up this article is because I feel NSURG is a research group that focuses on Spinal Neurosurgical Research which has provided multiple research opportunities for students/doctors and other individuals, hence deserving a mention in Wikipedia. NSURG is a non-profit organisation which advertising does not help in any means." However, it's still a puff piece and still has no independent references. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 13:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. The COI would maybe be okay in this case if the article wasn't so promotional. Either way, the sources don't appear to make NeuroSpine notable.Burroughs&#39;10 (talk) 18:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:39, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:NORG and WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:49, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I could not find any appropriate independent material.  The subject does seem to have some non routine recognition in their field but it would be essentially OR to demonstrate that with the available sources. Aoziwe (talk) 09:24, 25 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.