Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurocinema


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 18:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Neurocinema

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism; Google finds no hits that apply to the topic of this article. There is only one source given and it does not use this term at all. Looie496 (talk) 20:46, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Let me correct my statement: the source does use the term once.  But I still don't feel that that's enough to justify an article. Looie496 (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Wired.com and Popular Science will cover neurocinema soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wizardofcheese (talk • contribs)
 * Delete: I found zero sources for this. Joe Chill (talk) 23:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 11:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as Neologism: the stub even says "The word "Neurocinema" was coined ... in 2009." Bearian (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent! That will be the time to create a Wikipedia article.  Even if it is deleted now, nothing will keep you from creating it again once you have adequate sources. Looie496 (talk) 22:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per Neo. Darrenhusted (talk) 17:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Here is a link to a recent article article published on MentalFloss.com about neurocinema. http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/34584 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousneakymonkey (talk • contribs) — Yousneakymonkey (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The message above was the first contrib by this editor. Looie496 (talk) 00:18, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Here is a link to the Wired.com about neurocinema. http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/09/neurocinema-aims-to-change-the-way-movies-are-made/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yousneakymonkey (talk • contribs)


 * Comment Now that's a proper source. I'm not quite sure that it establishes notability according to Wikipedia's rigorous standards, but I can say that if it had been used by the article at the start, I wouldn't have set up this AfD.  (Yes, I'm aware that it has only now been published.) Looie496 (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * One article is not significant coverage. Even with one wired ref the article is still too new to be credible. Darrenhusted (talk) 13:34, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.