Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuroscience resources


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of neuroscience databases. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  18:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Neuroscience resources

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This isn't really what Wikipedia's for, is it? I can't think of a policy off the top of my head, but I'm sure it falls foul of one of them- we can't have an "article" which just links to news sites about neuroscience and blogs. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:43, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:50, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to List of neuroscience databases. This article has overlap with List of neuroscience databases and it is not clear to me how the resources listed are not databases. Hence, it seems best to merge to the better developed list. --Mark viking (talk) 21:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge WP:Repository. Millbug  talk 04:36, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:25, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Per Mark Viking, Merge if someone is willing to do this, delete if not. Blythwood (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to perform the merge if that becomes the consensus. --Mark viking (talk) 18:34, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge. Thank you, . Bearian (talk) 18:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.