Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuroscientist in gulf war propaganda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 20:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Neuroscientist in gulf war propaganda

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced, WP:OR, borderline incomprehensible essay. — æk Talk 08:33, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator. Generally non comprehensible and un-encyclopaedic.-- blue 520  11:26, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Borderline nonsensical article. Presentation and distinct lack of references indicates Original Research, supported by the fact that the author has made no edits to any page other than that up for deletion. It is difficult to even summarise what the article is about, the introduction and "Abstract" sections are not in clear enough english to indicate what is saveable from the article. Fenix down (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Poorly translated and biased essay on the first Gulf War, the propaganda surrounding it, effects on morale, etc etc, god only knows what else. "On 11th March in 1991, the Japanese neuroscientist arrived Japan and Japanese Right Wing started to try to kill her because they believed that former British Prime Thatcher wanted to kill the neuroscientist in Britain." Bizarre stuff, but the relevant parts are already covered in the appropriate articles. KaySL (talk) 13:48, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  —Nick-D (talk) 06:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an incomprehensible essay Nick-D (talk) 06:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Bizarre, paranoid, and incomprehensible are the words that occur to me. Looie496 (talk) 17:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia is not the place where you publish your research paper. --Defender of torch (talk) 07:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - many issues; appears to be original research, and an essay (Wikipedia is not a soapbox). It's also borderline non-sense.   Cocytus   [»talk«]  20:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.