Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurotically Yours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy keep as a bad-faith nomination. AmiDaniel (talk) 07:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Neurotically Yours
A Web Flash series that has not been noticed in any popular newspapers. Therefore according to the Wikipedia rules, this page should be deleted.

Post your debates on this issue below:


 * Strong Delete - This flash series has not been noted in and major newspapers what so ever. —Coolboyman (talk • contribs).
 * Very Strong Keep very popular series, noted on the web. It is not enough that,"This flash series has not been noted in and major newspapers what so ever." Thetruthbelow[[Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif|20px]] (talk) 02:48, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Very Strong Delete Regarding the comment above, its the rules, and I've never heard of this flash series ever, nobody I know knows about it, and I know a few hundred different kinds of people. It might be popular in its own "fanbase", but outside of it, it is not notiable what so ever. - Travis —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.4.193.231 (talk • contribs).
 * Comment Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean no one else has. Have you done a google search? It has a very large amount of hits. It is also on many websites. Thetruthbelow[[Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif|20px]] (talk) 02:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I just did a google search for the title of the series, and it only came up with 416 pages, (103 Specific Web Sites) thats not enough to have a page in wikipedia. - Travis —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.4.193.231 (talk • contribs).
 * Comment What google search did you do. Mine turned up 128,000 hits. I think that is quite enough to keep the article. Thetruthbelow[[Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif|20px]] (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Lol Sorry I typod. Anyways, it still only has 712 SPECIFIC Websites that mention them. the 128,000 is based on how many web pages mention them (And several web pages can be on the same website saying the same thing so those wouldnt count). - Travis —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.4.193.231 (talk (talk)''' 03:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Although I'm sure nobody will be surprised, this IP has been blocked three separate times. -- Kicking222 03:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I thought so, this editor is obviously not qualifyied to determine afd, since he is and was a blockee.Thetruthbelow[[Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif|20px]] (talk) 03:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * CommentStill 712 hits is more than enough to keep this article. That is a decent amount of notability. Thetruthbelow[[Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif|20px]] (talk) 03:07, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd have to Disagree, but we'll see in the end if this gets deleted or not. - Travis — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.193.231 (talk • contribs)


 * Keep As far as webcomics go, this one is notable. It gets TONS of Google hits (and the vast majority actually related to the comic), and for something that exists exclusively on the web, that's as good as it gets. -- Kicking222 03:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reasonably notable webcomic.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  03:11, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Close as bad faith nomination Guys, AFD isn't the place for childish games. Looking at contribs, I'm not convinced that this AFD is in good faith.  Notice that User:24.4.193.231 himself has edited the article before, tagged the author of this comic for a speedy , and has multiple blatant vandalism edits  .  Of late, his obsession seems to have been removing references to this comic.  BigDT 03:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Oh whah whah whah . Im trying to improve this place now and you people are STILL Complaing, what do you want me to do? Im trying to change.. - Travis —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.4.193.231 (talk •


 * Delete this, it has no relevance to history, science, and can barely be classified as entertainment. It offers no useful information, since the only people who would read this page already knows everything about it anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyberen (talk • contribs)


 * Creating extra accounts doesn't get you more votes. (This isn't a vote anyway - it's a consensus.)  Use of sockpuppet accounts for votestacking is one sure way to earn the ire of those around you.  BigDT 03:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong speedy keep Very notable webcomic, speedy keep per BigDT Hobbeslover talk/contribs 03:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep notable. When I walk the halls at college, I have on a regular basis seen random people watching this in the cubicles. As well I agree with this being a bad faith nomination. See user talk page who nominated this. Many notes of vandalism. --Crossmr 03:41, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep very notable. Being in a paper newspaper has little to do with the notability of mass internet popularity of which wikipedia often has articles for.  I challenge the basic nature of the justification for an AfD.  Kevin Breitenstein 04:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Self-comment This page could become the target for vandal-like activities if certain online groups who vehimantly oppose it find this page. Kevin Breitenstein 04:08, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep notable comic --MarsRover 05:24, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Reasonably notable, bad faith nomination.  OhNo itsJamie Talk 05:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable web comic. -- Zawersh 06:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.