Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neurovisceral Exhumation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:16, 3 January 2020 (UTC)

Neurovisceral Exhumation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Neurovisceral Exhumation is a Brazilian goregrind band. Even though they had multiple albums, I did not found any source that discusses the band's history, only databases that can be edited by anyone. (https://www.google.com/search?q=neuro+visceral+exhumation&oq=neurovisceral+exhum&aqs=chrome.2.69i57j69i60j0j69i60l2.7310j0j4&client=ms-android-huawei&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8) This is the main problem with articles about goregrind bands: they are only listed in websites that can be edited by anyone, because this style is considered to be underground. There are some goregrind bands that have reliable sources, but I did not find anything for Neurovisceral Exhumation, only databases (such as Encyclopaedia Metallum, Discogs, Rate Your Music) and sites that you can buy shirts with the band's logo or album cover on it or their albums. But no history or anything. I don't think they are notable for Wikipedia. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment This discussion page was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination itself at this time.   For future nominations, please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO.  Thank you.  --Finngall talk  15:43, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  15:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. --Finngall talk  15:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Ok, I try to. These three pages were my first deletion nominations so I did not know everything. I think that I won't even do this again in the future.

GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 14:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 18:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - I believe I voted on this the last time it was proposed, and my stance is the same; I agree there isn't enough verifiable sources to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. KailuaKid (talk) 21:57, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.