Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neutral atom quantum computer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__Speedy Keep (nomination withdrawn). Eluchil404 (talk) 23:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Neutral atom quantum computer

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article describes 2023 results. While the topic might become suitable for a page, it is too soon. As yet there is no evidence of extensive citing or other secondary results (beyond science blogs). Ldm1954 (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ldm1954 (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)


 * This page is still valid without the 2023 results. Neutral atom quantum computers were proposed in the late 90s. Vtomole (talk) 15:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  16:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: the term is well established in academic literature, including the prestigious Nature journal. Current sourcing can be improved, but existing SIGCOV already establishes notability. Owen&times; &#9742;  15:18, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep it is clearly one of the main competing quantum computing architectures availables. See people like QuEra Computing Inc. who have been working on that for a while. The article is not the best but it can be improved. Edit: This implementation can also be found in many textbooks.--ReyHahn (talk) 23:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep The Review paper has almost 3000 citation; the 2023 Nature article has 40 citations. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:29, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I am withdrawing my nomination as others feel it is notable. Keep Ldm1954 (talk) 23:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.