Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neutron bomb in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete Ironholds (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Neutron bomb in popular culture

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Completely unsourced trivia list that just happens to be a standalone article. If this were an article section rather than a complete article, this would be removed as original research without anyone's even batting an eye. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:26, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as trivia -- Whpq (talk) 20:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Collections of information don't get much more indiscriminate than this. Deor (talk) 23:31, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia used to abound with ipc articles. Ironically, it was part of the maturing process as Wikipedia went from something nobody took seriously to being the most consulted reference service on the internet.  Crap like this actually used to be part of our article on the neutron bomb itself, and that was true of many articles in the "Simpsons days" (i.e., the article about the Gettysburg Address might include a mention that "Lisa starts reciting the address and Bart says 'fourscore can eat my shorts'").  The rationale back then was that we "had to" have ipc articles to protect the serious articles.  Nowadays, nobody would think of putting stuff like this in an article about the neutron bomb.  Mandsford 17:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Per WP:IPC, articles like this do serve to keep such content out of main encyclopedia articles, contra Mandsford, everything here can be primarily sourced, etc. The alternative is to merge back into Neutron bomb, per WP:ATD, but I really don't think that's a better outcome. Jclemens (talk) 04:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I am mostly joking when I say, you can't have this article, it is mine, and I am not telling you where I put it. Go ahead, call it crap again, I dare you. Anarchangel (talk) 07:03, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I stopped taking dares after Schwartz dared me to stick my tongue to the flagpole and then the bell rang and now I relive it every 2 hours on Christmas Eve...
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.