Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Never.no


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Never.no

 * – ( View AfD View log )

May be worthy of being saved, but there appears to be little info to rely on other than the company's own web site. Has an "advert" feel, and is without valid references. Possible WP:COI Taroaldo (talk) 19:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable advertisement. SL93 (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Lacks any notable encyclopedic content. Cloudz 679 12:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cloudz. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 18:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. -- Whpq (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mentoz86 (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - I doubt it has a chance to improve if it's COI. Perhaps because it's from Norway, I haven't found any news coverage aside from this small mention here. If this article has a chance, it's better to start new. SwisterTwister   talk  23:58, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.