Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nevermind (1989 video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom withdrew and all other comments are keeps. Izno (talk) 18:34, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Nevermind (1989 video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is unsourced, and web search for "nevermind video game" only shows sources related to the 2015 video game. The 1989 video game doesn't seem to be notable. Not a very active user (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC) I no longer support deleting this article, as sources establishing notability have been found. Not a very active user (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Not a very active user (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: There is at least one review in Amiga Computing. Unfortunately, GameRankings doesn't have any reviews indexed, and scouring the Internet Archive is difficult because most results from that time point to Nirvana's album of that name instead. Google might also not be the best way to assess the notability of a game released before the WWW. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 07:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Found 3 more contemporary magazine reviews in New Atari User, The Games Machine and ACE (magazine) . That, along with Amiga Computing review above, makes it a pass of WP:GNG, requiring multiple significant coverage in reliable sources. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * pinging. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources found by Jovanmilic and IceWelder. Not a very active user (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Kudos to you, as I don't usually see AfD nominators to withdraw like this. I have added all references to the article now, so that should fix the unsourced issue (which indeed was a big one). Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep as sources found make it pass WP:GNG XVDC (talk) 12:49, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.