Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewCom International


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

NewCom International

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional article about a communications company with unclear notability. The company did win one award, however Google News only returns press releases. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 19:27, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Another global telecommunications provider advertising on Wikipedia.  Referenced only to in-company sources. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:17, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Several sources are from Satmagazine.com, (see article), which doesn't appear to be affiliated with NewCom International. Northamerica1000 (talk) 07:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * More specifically, this source from Satmagazine.com is an interview with a NewCom International employee:, and may possibly be applicable regarding topic notability. However, these two articles from Satmagazine.com were written by a NewCom International employee, and are considered primary sources (not suitable to prove notability): and . Northamerica1000 (talk) 02:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 04:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete Lack of reliable third party sources to attest to notability. No news hits, all are afor namesakes Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 04:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet our N guidelines.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.