Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewPGen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:49, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

NewPGen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Pure WP:OR: the only hits on Scholar Google are a thesis and an ArXiV preprint (very rare to have only two hits) D.Lazard (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. D.Lazard (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Concur with nomination; my searches only found passing mentions. A prod on this article was recently removed by User:Explicit, with the explanation that User:Gusfriend had proposed merging the content elsewhere, but with no good sources there is nothing to merge (and the proposed merge target was in any case too broad for mention of this software to be relevant). —David Eppstein (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I looked into this when I happened to see the list of prod'ed mathematics-related articles the other day, and I couldn't find any reason to keep it. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:44, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I initially thought that there might be a place for it in one of the tables on the prime numbers page but I am happy with to support a delete.Gusfriend (talk) 23:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.