Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewSQL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 02:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

NewSQL

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NEOLOGISM that appears to have recently been coined and is being used for marketing by a small group of small companies. As yet no significant coverage in google. noq (talk) 17:57, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Given the names associated with the subject, I think it's possible we will have an article on this topic in few years.  But it's just not soup yet.  Wikipedia is not a crystal ball of technologies and concepts that may or may not succeed WP:CRYSTAL.  The only sources offered are primary sources and when I Googled, I couldn't find additional sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG.  Msnicki (talk) 23:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep/Move This is a new type of database system that is being explored in many universities. The article needs to be rewritten and cleaned up. The giant list of companies needed to be removed. Maybe just move it to the Parallel database article? UMD-Database (talk) 00:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete a [[WP:NEOLOGISM coined to market a report. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.