Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Age International University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

New Age International University

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no such thing. Purely imaginary.  DGG ( talk ) 22:57, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:28, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV and thus WP:GNG. Not all diploma mills are notable. Bearian (talk) 17:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If not kept, redirect to List of unaccredited institutions of higher education as this would continue to provide useful information re the credibility of degrees purchased from this organisation. – Fayenatic  L ondon 09:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: New Age International Publishers is currently redirected to the "University" article, but this identification may be incorrect. I have started a discussion on that at Talk:New Age International Publishers. – Fayenatic  L ondon 21:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not a serious entity nor an encyclopedic one. And the Principality of Seborga officially states on their website that they are not involved in any universities and that any study grants given in the name of / recognized by the Principality of Seborga are fake (see point 3C here). --InfattiVedeteCheViDice (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - If it exists at all, non-notable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:19, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete pure crap. There's nothing that suggests this is a notable organization (just self-references), and evidence above that it's not (even a micronation disowns it, indirectly).  There is something to Fayenatic london suggestion of a redirect; there is some value in a search result making clear this is "pure crap". power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 02:04, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.