Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Austrian School of Economics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

New Austrian School of Economics

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No independent sources. No evidence of any notability. Does not meet WP:GNG. Part of a walled garden including Antal E. Fekete and Sandeep Jaitly (the latter also at AfD). Guillaume2303 (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 22:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No outside sources, no evidence at all of notability. LK (talk) 09:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: I am sure the lack of participation in the AfD has more to do with people being scared of, or hating, economics.  But I agree with the nomination. The concept is a creation of Prof. Fekete and has not attained any notability generally or in published research that I can locate.--Milowent • hasspoken  15:42, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, there doesn't appear to be a physical location for this, can't find any references of substance to support an article.  PK  T (alk)  15:53, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete does not appear to be notable. Lacks coverage in reliable independent sources. Fails the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 02:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.