Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Classical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 00:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

New Classical

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This stub is entirely original research and obviously cites no sources, thus automatically fails WP:OR and WP:V. --Leon Sword 01:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like an advertisement rather than an article, agree that its obviously OR perhaps to promote the listed groups. Allgoodnamesalreadytaken 02:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd Prod'ed this one for precisely the same reason that the AfD nomination is being made, so I'm well and truly in agreement here. It's also borderline free of context, since there's no explanation of what actually makes New Classical what it is, rather than just saying "these bands play it". BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unattributed and seems to be non-notable. Carlosguitar 11:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Keb25 15:23, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This seems to be covered, albeit slightly, in the Crossover (music) article, Neoclassicism in general, and to some extent in the List of popular songs based on classical music. I must say however that there seems to be no agreed upon term for this type of classical-modern music hybrid; even the most commonly accepted phrase ("Classical crossover") is often vehemently disagreed upon. I do not think Deletion should be answer, at least for the moment until a broader consensus can be found. Zidel333 20:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. As the article stood when I looked at it, there's no evidence this isn't a neologism or pure OR. --Gwern (contribs) 05:58 23 September 2007 (GMT)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.