Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Eden Fellowship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  03:06, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

New Eden Fellowship
Nonnotable church, text reads like advertising/proselytizing. NawlinWiki 02:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  Does not state the importance of the subject. I got 95 hits on Yahoo, 74 hits on MSN, and Google only had 29 hits. I would say that this is not notable. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 06:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I did improve the layout of the article... what was there was really poor. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 06:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Jesus spam. --Xrblsnggt 06:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above, congregation of purely local interest. Smerdis of Tlön 14:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom.    Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  16:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NN and religious spam. Th ε Halo Θ 16:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Reads lika a WP:VAIN article. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  18:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. parishcruft. Carlossuarez46 20:38, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertisement for an individual church, which is not notable on its own. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 06:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.