Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New England Sikh Study Circle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  16:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

New England Sikh Study Circle

 * – ( View AfD View log )



Reads like their own website. Has no sources. The Determinator  p  t  c  17:43, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sikhism-related deletion discussions. The Determinator   p  t  c  17:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. The Determinator   p  t  c  17:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I added three other articles about Sikh temples in Massachusetts to this AfD. The other articles had been prodded, but I think it makes sense to consider all three of these local Sikh articles in the same fashion. --Orlady (talk) 19:21, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * agreed, same issues. so discuss once. Thanks. The Determinator   p  t  c  20:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)


 * DeleteA passing mention in an article discussing a different issue entirely is insufficient to show notability.JoelWhy (talk) 21:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. This would seem to fall under the same general guidelines as those for churches and synagogues. Are there any such guidelines for notability of churches and synagogues? There are many such articles in Wikipedia. What is the rationale for inclusion? •••Life of Riley (T–C) 19:59, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Here are the guidelines you requested. Although these were suggested but consensus has not yet bee reached. The Determinator   p  t  c  03:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete After analysis I think these articles probably meet A7 and I don't see anything that would say that these meet WP:GNG The Determinator   p  t  c  15:53, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.