Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:03, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

New Game
Wikipedia is not for things you made up one day at school. Original research. No NPOV. Bobby1011 04:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete KI 04:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Here we have a literal example of a thing made at school one day. -- Samir ∙ TC  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|  ]] 04:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I am trying to start an article for people to write about home-made games. As I have time to add more games I will do so. DrewQuinton 4:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not the optimal venue for original research in re. games  . — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 04:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. But intro belongs in BJAODN: "new games are games that you and your friends have made up amungts yourselves, and would like to share with the rest of the world. If one finds himself (or herself) with a few friends and a little too much time on his hands, and would like to occupy that time, continue reading below." Daniel Case 06:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic. Cnwb 06:52, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Chairman S.  |  Talk  07:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Squigish 07:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as just about as WP:NFT as it gets. -- Kinu t /c  07:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this is not what the wiki is for. Kusonaga 09:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Pointless Kiddies games - not encyclopedic. --Notjarvis 12:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.The Republican 01:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (seems the quintisential definition of things you made up one day at school). Would have thought this was perfect for WP:PROD tho'. – Doug Bell talk&bull;contrib 09:47, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.