Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Glasgow Junior High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 15:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

New Glasgow Junior High School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a middle school that makes no assertion of notability or significat difference from anyother middle school. Speedy tag removed by anon. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 22:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No assertion of notabilty. Only 1,120 ghits. M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 22:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Epbr123 00:09, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.  -- Noroton 00:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep created today, put up for deletion today. It is a waste of our time to be considering this so soon. WP:GIVETHECREATORTIMETOACTUALLYCREATETHEDAMNARTICLE. Noroton 01:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - The article hasn't been listed for speedy deletion, so you still have 4 days before the discussion closes. If you post info. about notability, and address the other concerns before then, you can certainly include that here.   ◄    Zahakiel    ►   19:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Articles are supposed to conform to WP policies from the time they are first posted.  If somebody needs 15 minutes to expand and hit 'save' a couple of times, that's one thing.  But without any WP:A to show the subject is WP:N, the article never should have been created in the first place.  That's what notepad.exe and /sandboxes are for. --Butseriouslyfolks 01:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree w/Butseriouslyfolks. No notabilty asserted, article is a trumped up .doc --Masterpedia 02:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:N and WP:A and I can't find anything that would help it pass --Xarr 08:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It might pass WP:N, but it definitely does not meet WP:A as no sources, primary or otherwise, are provided.  Yamaguchi先生 03:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.