Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Hampshire Rail Transit Authority


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to New Hampshire Department of Transportation. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

New Hampshire Rail Transit Authority

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is no indication of any significant contributions from this agency, as it was short-lived and never accomplished its intended purpose, and does not necessarily need an entire article that gives undue detail into this agency. This article should be merged, the topic would be better suited as a brief section in the NHDOT article or some other relevant article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OldPalChummus (talk • contribs) 20:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 May 10.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Transportation,  and New Hampshire.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge the administrative information to New Hampshire Department of Transportation per nom. Details of the individual rail projects are already covered on the relevant rail line articles. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. As author Ronald Dale Karr put it, New Hampshire has been by far the least supportive of commuter rail out of the six New England states. This authority unfortunately didn't accomplish much of anything, but merits a mention at the NHDOT article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge as per what my two colleagues suggest above would indeed be the best choice here. TH1980 (talk) 02:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.