Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Heights Educational Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Katietalk 11:47, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

New Heights Educational Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organisation that fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Created and maintained by users with conflicts of interest, and no evidence of actual substantial coverage about them, as required by Wikipedia Joseph2302 (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Four references, none with significant discussion of the subject, no. 3 does not even mention it. Maproom (talk) 22:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and delete it Atchopra (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've no particular opinion on whether the Stevie and the Ohio State secretary mention just barely constitute notability. However,, it seems that was I who added the States News Service ref, currently #3, to the page. My Highbeam access seems to have expired, so I can't check, but I'm pretty sure that I added it because it does mention the group (I just can't think how I'd have found it otherwise). , I've no knowledge of, connection with, or interest in, the group – I tidied up the page after mistakenly nominating for speedy deletion (G11/G12) without first checking the talk-page. I've tried to keep it tidy since then. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I see I was wrong – I read the paragraphs that were displayed when I clicked on ref. 3, but failed to notice that's there's more behind a paywall. Maproom (talk) 16:44, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I meant the other SPAs who've been editing this article. I had no intention of saying you were editing with a COI. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * ,, no problem. On reflection, I can't see how a mention among seven non-profits in a monthly round-up in one state alone could help to justify any claim of notability, so I think it all hinges on the Stevie. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete and I actually consider this A7 material, nothing actually convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  22:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as the subject does not meet the general notability guideline. &mdash; Music1201  talk  21:31, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete article and salvage content by merge into an encyclopedic list as a section in Stevie Awards of all stevie award recipients, which will also improve the stevie awards article. Aoziwe (talk) 13:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and agree with Aoziwe on the merge into the Stevie Awards LAroboGuy (talk) 22:31, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.