Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Horizons Global Partners


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 04:39, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

New Horizons Global Partners

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIRS. Native advertising.  scope_creep Talk  20:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:38, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Claimed events are routine and do not pass WP:NCORP. 1292simon (talk) 09:22, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep INC, Reuters, and FR sources are all reliable and passes WP:GNG seems well notable within the related industry. JK.Kite (talk) 20:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Not a single reference is valid. The reuters ref is an business announcement, fails WP:CORPDEPTH.   scope_creep Talk  20:42, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - just another unremarkable provider of "solutions". . . Mean as custard (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   14:29, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 19:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:ORGIND. --SalmanZ (talk) 15:23, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH  Devoke water   (talk)  16:24, 19 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.