Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Industrial Revolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 13:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

New Industrial Revolution

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to be an OR essay/research paper. ukexpat (talk) 15:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Speculation, WP:SOAP, also attempts to coin neologisms. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:33, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete OR Change Name. It's not an Industrial Revolution if it is shutting down industry, could be re-named to the Green Revolution. Or just delete, as suggested. Ggoere (talk) 17:21, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Green Revolution already exists, but it refers to the technology introduced in the mid-20th-Century to increase agricultural output, and has nothing to do with modern environmentalism. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:27, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - OR Essay. Blueboar (talk) 18:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment from the talk page: "Please help improve this page to the wikipedia standards. It has survived one deletion already, and if deleted again, this information may be lost forever. ~ * ~ Blue Lunar Storm ~ * ~ (talk) 7:23 pm, 4 December 2009, Friday (19 days ago) (UTC−5)".\
 * Reply... not a good argument at AfD. ... If Blue Lunar Storm is worried, he/she can copy this essay to a personal web page so it won't be "lost forever". Blueboar (talk) 21:38, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article was not deleted before now due to backlogs and/or procedural errors. It could have been deleted as a PROD nomination. Vassyana (talk) 07:35, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. McDonough's Cradle to Cradle approach has been called a "new industrial revolution" but this article embroiders that basic with a variety of OR on Green and biomimetics topics that have no affiliation with that label. It's also a very common catchphrase  for many kinds of initiative, again in many cases nothing to do with the picture presented in the article. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 02:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.