Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Life Church Bristol


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 16:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

New Life Church Bristol

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable Rathfelder (talk) 15:01, 3 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Article makes no claim of notability. This one falls under WP:ROUTINE. I also note that it was created by an SPA. MB 06:04, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - possibly WP:TOOSOON, but doesn't seem notable at this point. Smmurphy(Talk) 04:24, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete A7. No claim of importance, even an incredible one (in the literal sense). Article simply states that the organization exists. Timothy Joseph Wood  14:52, 10 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.