Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New London Fire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Mets501 (talk) 03:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

New London Fire

 * — (View AfD)
 * — (View AfD)

Fails WP:N and WP:V --Адам12901 Talk 03:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. CyberAnth 04:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all - no evidence from reliable sources that the subjects meet WP:MUSIC. Added their album to their nomination. MER-C 05:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all, fails WP:MUSIC, unverifiable. Can't find any reliable sources. Terence Ong 14:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BAND. —ShadowHalo 22:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, just falls short of requirements. Can't really see why WP:V comes into it, you can buy their record on Amazon, it's unverified rather than unverifiable. Malla  nox  03:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No indication that it meets Notability (music). -- Donald Albury 14:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. If they release one more album they'll fulfil criterion #4 of WP:MUSIC.--HisSpaceResearch 19:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Commment What? if you delete this article based on this then you'll have to trawl wikipedia and delete hundreds of bands! Being more popular than many trivial local bands you find on here, and having released on album and ep that are widely available, they are quite clearly noteable. Barbara Osgood 16:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sure that most of us agree with you, especially those that said delete. I thin kthat they are more notable than several garage type bands on here, and I think those should be deleted, too. It's just a question of getting the time to search through thousands of band articles trying to find the ones that fail WP:BAND. -Адам12901 Talk 21:39, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.