Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Millennium Bean Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Captain Beany. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

New Millennium Bean Party

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While I feel that Captain Beany may be a notable figure, I believe that the mention of this party on his page is sufficient, and that the New Millennium Bean Party is not notable under Wikipedia's criteria on its own (as Captain Beany ran for all intents and purposes as an independent with a party label next to his name, if you will). Therefore, I believe this page should either be deleted and replaced with a redirect to Captain Beany's page, or deleted and merged into a "Minor British political parties" page of some sort.Tyrenon (talk) 06:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Captain Beany - has had quite a bit of press coverage, but as Tyrenon says, the party essentially consists only of the one person, so it would be best to include all the information in one article. Warofdreams talk 12:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll agree to a merge.Tyrenon (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC).
 * Merge I agree with a merge as long as any Election box metadata doesn't mess up doktorb wordsdeeds 22:40, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  —Artw (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:59, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Captain Beany as suggested. Please note that AFD is not required for this. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Captain Beany per all of the above. Artw (talk) 03:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.