Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Montreal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123    (e)  19:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

New Montreal
I vote for this page to be deleted because the information appears to be a hoax. If this article is indeed legitimate, please state your case here. Trapper 16:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The first sentence of the article itself states that this movement or ideal or whatever was created less than two weeks ago. It's complete nonsense, and it certainly doesn't deserve a Wikipage. Strong delete. -- Kicking222 17:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism. --BillC 18:27, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a hoax. --AlainV 19:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Userfy To whoever made the article. I will also show them to the Fiction Wiki. The Republican 19:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: No evidence that this is a hoax outside of personal opinion.  --68.210.128.198 19:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is SO a hoax! -- H eptor  talk 21:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: There is no substantial information to show that as of Easter Friday 2006 that there is a New Montreal. I brought this up in discussion and do not feel there is such a thing as a New Montreal. --[[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|20px]] Eric B ( T • C • W ) 22:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete -- crystal ball clause. Haikupoet 01:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - wikipedia is not a manifesto host --Ajdz 05:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. I think it's something escaped from the Montreal Comedy Festival. Peter Grey 07:11, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as ridiculous hoax. Sure there's a New Montreal - it runs from Viger street to the North, McGill St to the West and St. Denis to the East - but this ain't it. Eusebeus 08:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:34, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as redonkulous. -- Osgoode  Lawyer  13:23, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.