Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Order tracks which include the title in the lyrics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  07:02, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

New Order tracks which include the title in the lyrics

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This has actually been around for over three years. I can't believe it's survived this long, as Wikipedia is NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. Totally trivial. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:05, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete About 90% of every song that has ever been written in the history of mankind has title in their lyrics. What's so special about that? Blueboy96 14:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic list. --Moonriddengirl 14:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Listcruft. Also, a knowingly incomplete list. Author mentions excluding "Blue Monday".--Sethacus 15:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment (Remarkably Pedantic on my part :O)) Actually not including Blue Monday is correct, as the lyrics of the song don't include the title. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 22:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment (looking at lyrics of Blue Monday) D'oh!--Sethacus 01:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - any number of 'songs by title feature' have been deleted and one specific to a particular band is no better. Otto4711 16:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per nom and WP:NOT. And WP:NOT. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 17:08, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Listcruft. Blueboy, 90% of all songs have the title in their lyrics; the fact that they are from New Order doesn't make them any better.  James   Luftan  contribs 18:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I think that's what Blueboy said... at least I understood it that way. No need for a put-down in any event. Delete per Blueboy Mandsford 21:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry Blueboy, I misread. I thought that you meant 90% of New Order songs had the title in their lyrics. I'm sorry. Thanks to Mandsford for letting me know. Also, I was not putting Blueboy down, I was expanding on a misread quote.  James   Luftan  contribs 02:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 22:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and RIP Tony Wilson. Grutness...wha?  01:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete EXTREMELY trivial information Corpx 06:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as extremely trivial, but perhaps try to remember this as a shining example of WP:LISTCRUFT. fuzzy510 07:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RegRCN 12:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as soon as possible. This is what free and open editing brings us.  Burntsauce 18:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.