Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Pedestrianism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was MERGE to New Urbanism. TigerShark 11:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

New Pedestrianism
Appears to be an example of WP:NEO. No real independent sources offered and it reads like original research. Delete as a non-notable term, unverifiable, and original research. Metros232 20:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to New Urbanism or possibly Michael E. Arth, provided the latter article is cleaned up. There were 52 Google hits for New Pedestrianism, which doesn't merit its own article, and much of the content does seem like original research/unrelated fluff.  Still, the topic is interesting and deserves a brief mention.  Fabricationary 21:05, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to New Urbanism per Fabricationary. -- Wine Guy  Talk  07:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

12:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
 * "'Keep'" MIchael E. Arth has been cleaned up, expanded, and kept. This link is now more relevant. New Pedestrianism is an important variant of New Urbanism that vastly improves it. I will add a paragraph to New Urbanism also.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.