Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Queens Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Queens Park Rangers F.C.. (non-admin closure) ミラP 15:47, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

New Queens Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Short, poorly sourced article about a proposed stadium that was never built. There is nothing notable about the proposal and in my opinion a mention of it on the Queens Park Rangers F.C. article is all that is needed. Not eligible for PROD due to a previous PROD five years ago. &mdash;  Gas Head Steve [TALK] 13:35, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &mdash;  Gas Head Steve [TALK] 13:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:43, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:46, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect - to Queens Park Rangers F.C.. GiantSnowman 19:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. This was a cancelled project that fails WP:Notability. on the face of it, I would normally agree with you to redirect but the only source given is the Daily Lies and one of the things I most like about WP is its classification of that as an unreliable source, which it is. No Great Shaker (talk) 21:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * plenty of other sources out there including BBC and BBC again and Architects Journal. GiantSnowman 22:18, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Queens Park Rangers F.C. as above. I accept that there are reliable sources as given so I agree that a redirect is the better option and have changed my previous entry to a comment. Thanks, . No Great Shaker (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.