Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Queer Cinema


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Oops, looks like I closed this a bit early as it was placed at the top of the page instead of the bottom. But consensus appears clear. If anyone has a problem with this please message me. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 00:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

New Queer Cinema
This article is insignificant. Nevermind2 22:14, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. This term has 44500 results in google. The article in Outrate is republished on authoritative movie site Sence of Cinema. There are number of books about this appearance. — fatal_exception ?! 23:15, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * But another Wikis don't contain this article. Russian article is simple translation of English one and was made by fatal_exception ?! :-) Nevermind2 23:26, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep. It's a good argument :). Good luck. — fatal_exception ?! 23:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * There is another one! The article's subject is interesting for particular specialists and isn't encyclopedia occurrence. Nevermind2 23:57, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per fatal exception, this appears to be notable and verifiable. IrishGuy 01:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It might be of interest to editors to view this other AfD on Dmitry Kuzmin Tyrenius 02:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Don't pay attention to this guy, that's only New Homophobic Wave in Russian wiki and nothing more :) --AndyVolykhov 05:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, nothin' but WP:POINT. Max S em 06:14, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep & expand. --The Wrong Man 08:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand Relevant and verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beno1000 (talk • contribs)
 * keep per Fatal Exception, and Nevermind, I suggest you stop with these possibly bad faith nominations. JoshuaZ 21:12, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand --Deville (Talk) 02:07, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand --Naha|(talk) 16:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand, although the queer theory in film does not necessary deal with homosexuals, this point should be made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.158.92 (talk • contribs) JoshuaZ 14:46, 5 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.