Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Republic Brewing Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

New Republic Brewing Company

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable small business. Google news, scholar and book searches turn up no results (unless I'm Doing It Wrong(tm)). The one independent reference provided is to a regional news outlet. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * (And the article creator appears to have a WP:COI as well.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:17, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete. I cannot find any secondary sources. In addition, the company's own website http://www.newrepublicbrewing.com/ says (as of 20 March 2011) "Exciting news: We now have both our federal and state permits to manufacture beer!". This further suggests they're not notable, at least not yet. JoeSperrazza (talk) 17:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete. A quick search on Beer Advocate elicited no returns, which means they're neither a bottler of beer nor a brewpub. The page is likely an advert for an aspiring brewery.--Chimino (talk) 04:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 17:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. First you make the beer, then you make the article.  Not the other way around. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:09, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete nothing in gnews. LibStar (talk) 07:30, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. At the moment the brewery is not known so it doesn't meet our inclusion criteria. When it becomes known and has a few reliable sources writing about it, then we can have an article.  SilkTork  *YES! 21:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.