Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Rochelle Council on the Arts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy deleted per WP:CSD. The sneaky re-creation is textbook Jvolkblum so consider this a speedy for multiple reasons. Wknight94 talk  08:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

New Rochelle Council on the Arts

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * Delete. Non-notable arts organization with no reliable third-party sources given.  Google search showed mostly self-promotion.  Author has apparent WP:COI issues based on name - see both  and .  Wknight94  talk  11:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. All the Ghits I found only mention the organization's name in passing. Erpert (let's talk about it) 11:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep was a city-created organization Dew Kane (talk) 04:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That alone doesn't make it notable; see WP:ORG and WP:PSTS. Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article was previously deleted by Wknight94 without any nomination for deletion being made. A request to restore the article was granted not more than a few days ago, and time should be allowed for further expansion.  There are also similar articles in existance on the site,  such as  Fairbanks Arts Association -  Allegany Arts Council -  Black Creek Arts Council -  and Hillsborough Arts Council - without issue. Nrarts (talk) 11:49, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, the article was userfied to User:Nrartshistory/New Rochelle Council on the Arts so you could improve it and then post back to main space. Instead, you created a new account and used the new account to post the exact same article right back into main space.  I am being courteous by not just re-speedy deleting the article.   Wknight94  talk  12:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge into the New Rochelle article -- it only merits a sentence in the Government section of that article. Warrah (talk) 17:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete It's an article created by a sockpuppet of a community banned user Jvolkblum. Minima  c  ( talk ) 07:03, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.