Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Snohomish High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete, defaulting to merge. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:26, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

New Snohomish High School
this page may not be notable Mentes 22:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge with Snohomish School District. I'm a high school inclusionist, but if I'm reading this and the district web site right this school hasn't been built or even given an actual name yet. Even by my broad standards, this one's not worth a seperate article yet. BryanG(talk) 23:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: It's an article on a... naught? Interesting... but as a school non-includeable, if that's a word. --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 00:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - as a non-notable non-existant school. Having a HS inclusionist "vote" delete sets the bar for me. :-) --Gay Cdn  (talk) (email) (Contr.) 00:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - I initially nominated under WP:SCHOOL, and nothing has changed my mind. Although I don't even know if it qualifies for consideration under WP:SCHOOL because it is still a hypothetical construct. Richardjames444 15:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge a summary under Snohomish School District. &mdash; RJH (talk) 15:07, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per RJH above. Data is valuable, but not yet sufficient to have a stand-alone article.  Badbilltucker 16:20, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree, Merge with the district. If that proves unpalatable to someone, I guess we could temporarily smerge as a section within Snohomish Senior High School instead. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 18:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Snohomish School District until this school actually exists. Yamaguchi先生 19:25, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge —  As all the above say. &mdash; RevRagnarok  Talk Contrib 02:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested above for the time being. Bahn Mi 22:10, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Promising article. Piccadilly 22:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.