Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Solidarity/Shared Poland


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. Spartaz Humbug! 08:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

New Solidarity/Shared Poland

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:TOOSOON - article about a political group launched barely nine days ago (!) Lack of media presence other than WP:NEWS articles of the day based on the group's press conference; zero in terms of WP:INDEPENDENT analyses, etc. Badly fails WP:NORG.

An word-to-word identical draft was submitted at AfC and was declined a few days ago by an uninvolved editor; still, the author has moved it to mainspace.

Summing up – way WP:TOO SOON. — kashmīrī  TALK  20:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  20:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  20:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Rafał_Trzaskowski. Agree that it's too soon, this is currently tied to him. Reywas92Talk 22:51, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

It is a political group that has only recently launched so you should not expect a wiki page the size of the one of the Civic Platform's. Let the page stay and it will become bigger. The movement already has 17,593 so it is gaining popularity, more people are talking about the movement as well. Therefore I see no reasonable explanation for deleting this article. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szczeszek2035 (talk • contribs) 05:50, October 27, 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:06, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Trzaskowski is a fairly weighty figure. I'm inclined to think we should leave the article for a bit and see if the organisation gets more coverage. Rathfelder (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTINHERITED. This is not an article on Trzaskowski but on his initiative (not: organisation) which seems to fail GNG at this moment. — kashmīrī  TALK  09:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: Red flags: No pl wiki article. Not mentioned in Polish Wikipedia biography of his. There is a bit of media coverage, but I think it is WP:TOOSOON to call his initiative notable. It may well become notable in few weeks or months, so I am also ok with draftying it instead of deleting. But for now it seems to fail WP:GNG. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify - under the assumption it will become notable within the near future. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Devoke water   (talk)  14:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * redirect to Trzaskowski. Clearly, info is verifiable, but independent notability is questionable now. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Why is it so important for you to delete the page Kashmiri? Is it just because you oppose the movement? I believe the page will grow over time 100%. It is the former candidate for President, his movement is only getting more members. I remember the day it launched, every hour I seen hundreds of people join the movement. It has been 2 weeks and as of 17:38 27/10/2020, the movement has 17,636 members. The only real reason you want to delete the page is most likely you oppose the cause. HAŃBA!


 * The article's author User:Szczeszek2035 has posted aggressive comments on my Talk page, linked to this nomination, basically a WP:PA. — kashmīrī  TALK  00:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)


 * kashmīrī How would you feel if your article would get deleted and it takes a third of a year for someone decent clearly not you to review and publish a page. You are just a heartless ignorant human. Your probably not even from Poland. You have no right to make yourself the victim of “abuse”. I have the right to be angry as it will be 4 months before someone decent reviews my article. HAŃBA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Szczeszek2035 (talk • contribs) 09:58, October 28, 2020 (UTC)  Striking a WP:NPA violation and leaving a warning at editors' talk page. Frutration is no excuse for rudeness. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify, article needs citation and more information. Alex-h (talk) 09:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Draftify, As no-one wants to keep the article on wikipedia for it to grow, I will work on it in draft space and hopefully have it more detailed as time goes on. Szczeszek2035
 * Delete per nom with no prejudice to draftification for improvements. -- KartikeyaS (talk) 19:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.