Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Standard Keyboard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Keyboard layout. PhilKnight (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

New Standard Keyboard

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Seems to be A non-noatable product The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 02:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Agree, not notable. -- BenTels (talk) 23:11, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep gets some coverage including a New York Times article. LibStar (talk) 06:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A review in the NYT is sufficient.   DGG ( talk ) 00:44, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Merge. Apart from the NYT article mentioned by LibStar, all I can find are what appear to be press releases or promotional blurbs by keyboard retailers. Unless there are other RSs that I've missed, the subject fails WP:GNG. It would, however, merit merging into Keyboard layout, which already has sections on a number of similar developments. Jimmy Pitt   talk  16:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge per Jimmy Pitt. If other sources are found a standaline article can be restored. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge per the above. The article consists of a single sentence, and is unlikely to become much longer.  Sandstein   10:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.