Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Theory of stellar evolution


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

New Theory of stellar evolution

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable concept. Only one source provided, which seems dubious and unreliable. A quick search on Google can find no results. Also, we have an article on stellar evolution - the 'new theory' seems to add nothing to the concept. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:44, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:45, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, Synthesis. The only actual source seems to be the book "Planet Sun" by a certain Sean Patterson. It doesn't seem to be academic however. It's a directly published eBook.--  Obsidi ♠ n   Soul   20:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The theory is a long ways away from the scientific consensus and has not attracted enough of a following to be otherwise notable. --Yaush (talk) 15:17, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - poorly written and weakly sourced synthesis, it adds nothing to the body of knowledge here, and is unlikely to be a search term. Bearian (talk) 20:43, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Looks likely a rambling collection of ideas that are not particularly "new" and might be considered OR, if they were original. The statements about sunspots being solidified matter is approaching surrealism. Regards, RJH (talk) 23:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fringe theories have nothing on this! It's...fringiest. Fringetastic? - The Bushranger One ping only 01:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.