Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Vision School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Raebareli. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

New Vision School

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I have nominated this article for deletion as it does not provide a neutral point of view, the article does not cite its sources and is not encyclopedia quality. Panpanman (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2009 (UTC). EDIT: After the major cleanup from TerriersFan, the reasons for nomination are no longer valid and I will withdraw my vote for AfD. The New Vision School article may remain as a stub. Panpanman (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete While the reasons cited by the nominator are not per se reasons to delete, the sources don't seem to be particularly reliable and I don't see any true assertation of notability. It's just a small private school. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:30, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Raebareli where the school is already mentioned. TerriersFan (talk) 19:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —TerriersFan (talk) 20:51, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge as proposed by TerriersFan. Considering the dearth of information in the article, and in the absence of sources, there's not much point in maintaining this as a separate article. However, the proposed destination article section is an unannotated list; if this material is to be merged there, the Schools section Raebareli needs to be expanded to an annotated list. --Orlady (talk) 22:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.