Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York City Water Tunnel No. 3

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Copyvio / Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:23, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

New York City Water Tunnel No. 3
Non notable. --Woohookitty 06:42, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Strong keep. This ranks up there with the Big Dig on the list of notorious urban engineering projects. See . Gamaliel 06:47, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Never mind, it's a copyvio. The topic deserves an article, however. Gamaliel 06:51, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Yippee-kai-yay, motherfucker! Keep but delete as a copyvio (so it can be created again without a speedy delete). --SPUI 20:17, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough, copyright violation. Megan1967 01:26, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. An extraordinarily notable engineering project, if only for its scale and duration (project planned in the 1960s, started in 1970, will continue to 2020; total cost ~$6 billion).  Someone really needs to write a non-copyvio article about this. --TenOfAllTrades 13:55, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)