Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Streets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:10, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

New York Streets

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Should be draftified. A single source, which the article's author says is not WP:RS because it gets other basic facts wrong, is not enough to base an article on. Found no other RS to supplement or further establish notability with GNG. A national arena league team does not have presumed notability per any SNG. There is WP:NODEADLINE - we can wait to have an article on this team until notability is more clearly established. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment The press conference was this morning, a second article was just released here, meaning it now has multiple independent refs that may meet WP:GNG. I am not the author, but I published to keep the original author's contributions (because someone was bound to create it after the press conference, and I felt the proper attribution to the edit history should be preserved.). As to RS, the publisher of that article (New York Daily News) was there to show independent coverage. My comment about basic facts was they did not do their homework (stating a team in the league is in Columbus, Ohio, when it is actually in Columbus, Georgia) and is a pretty typical error for independent coverage (meaning, for once, this team was covered by a publisher that is not a blog). Otherwise I do not care if this is kept, drafted, or deleted. I was just trying to give proper creation to the editor before someone made a new page. Yosemiter (talk) 23:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Draftify Clearly fails WP:GNG through a before search (only the NYDN article seems like it would pass, MAYBE one from Newsday), and if it passes GNG it probably still fails NOTNEWS. That being said, the article likely will be notable in the near future. Let's incubate it. SportingFlyer  talk  05:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify. WP:TOOSOON at the moment, but could well pass WP:GNG in the near future. Keep the text, but get it out of mainspace for now. Narky Blert (talk) 13:16, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Draftify currently doesn't meet requirements, but likely will in the future, so lets incubate it to allow for improvements until then --DannyS712 (talk) 10:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.