Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand–Romania relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

New Zealand–Romania relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination from the obsessive article creator. even the NZ government describes the relations as "slight". no active agreements between the countries since 1990. LibStar (talk) 04:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep pending the result of the discussion at Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations, which is directly related to the issue of notability, see Wikipedia_talk:Notability. Nomination for deletion is pre-mature and could preempt and poison the discussion which may see the development of additional criteria for notability. The nominator has ignored requests not to continue nominating these articles for deletion until the centralized discussion on notability has been resolved. Martintg (talk) 05:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 05:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Centralized discussions are not arbitration, or even mediation. There is no definite outcome of a centralized discussion, and even if there was, the underlying issue is and will always be one of notability. There is no apparently notability listed here. If someone can add it, then it should stay, and if we delete it now, and someone discovers it later, then it should stay later. Even clearer here since the government acknowledges it as "slight". Shadowjams (talk) 05:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no notability beyond the mere existence of relations is asserted - and those aren't inherently notable. - Biruitorul Talk 06:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 09:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 09:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 09:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The "relations" here are that NZ officials are aware Romania exists. No notability, coverage etc. Dahn (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete For those of us who want to look at the article and its references, | New Zealand foreign ministry notes a "slight" relationship that won't be outside of NZ's dealings with the EU in general, and | Romania's embassy in Australia don't show much. Save it to your hard drive if you like the page.  Mandsford (talk) 20:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - the fact that these two countries exist is notable but is covered by their own entries in Wikipedia. Daveosaurus (talk) 07:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant content, and little chance of real expansion. -- Avenue (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication that WP:N is, or ever will be, satisfied. No need at all for this article per WP:Summary style. Note to closing admin: The "keep" vote above is clearly invalid since the discussion is clearly not going to finish with a result any time soon, and it's already obvious that there would be no consensus for a subject-specific notability guideline that would modify, rather than interpret, the general notability criteria. Any such guideline would be based on deletion discussions such as this one. --Hans Adler (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.