Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand–Ukraine relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 09:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

New Zealand–Ukraine relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another laughable combination from the obsessive article creator. not a shred of notable relationship, no resident embassies. even the NZ foreign affairs website makes no mention of relationship with Ukraine LibStar (talk) 12:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If the foreign ministry do not think it significant enough to talk about it, how could it possibly be notable? Nyttend (talk) 12:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Once again, a randomly created article that does nothing to assert notability in world affairs, and is not likely to be able to. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  14:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - amusing, but in no sense notable. - Biruitorul Talk 15:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a directory or a collection of miscellaneous information like where embassies are. Fails WP:N. Edison (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Updating with new sources now. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 00:22, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - My fault turns out the sources didn't pan out. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 00:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. - gadfium  00:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable and no meaningful content. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep pending outcome of discussion at the Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 00:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The discussion at Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations is directly related to Wikipedia_talk:Notability. Deletion could preempt the result of the discussion which could see the development of additional criteria for notability. You have ignored requests not to continue nominating these articles for deletion until the centralized discussion on notability has been resolved. This behavior is rather disruptive. Martintg (talk) 01:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Piotrus. Martintg (talk) 01:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 01:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - the fact that these two countries exist is notable but is covered by their own entries in Wikipedia. Daveosaurus (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 13:12, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant content, and little chance of real expansion. -- Avenue (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.