Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Rocketry Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 03:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

New Zealand Rocketry Association

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

created by a pure single purpose editor, fails WP:ORG, hardly anything on gnews, google search reveals mainly directory listings. LibStar (talk) 02:26, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. - gadfium  06:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, enough news coverage - 10 results at the NZ Herald, 2 at stuff, TV3, TVNZ, The Shed magazine has an article, lots of hits at the CAA including involvement in amending regulations. Also too soon to call SPA, may just be first article. XLerate (talk) 08:31, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, XLerate has proven news coverage.- gadfium 20:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, XLerate has proven news coverage.- gadfium 20:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:07, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * I created the article and have not had any time to improve it, I have asked other members of the NZRA to improve it. This appears to be a "single purpose edit" because I do not know my old account details so have just done it without an account(created/edited Wikipedia articles a few years back)- Chris 12:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.161.138 (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.