Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2001


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep the whole shebang. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2001

 * – ( View AfD View log )

We don't need this – it's not notable. No other year-end record chart is listed entirely on Wikipedia. I have created List of year-end number-one singles (New Zealand), which should be a suitable replacement. The following would also need deleting: Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2001
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2002
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2003
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2004
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2005
 * New Zealand Top 20 Singles of 2006
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2007
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2008
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2009
 * New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2010
 * New Zealand Top 50 Albums of 2001
 * New Zealand Top 50 Albums of 2002
 * New Zealand Top 50 Albums of 2003
 * New Zealand Top 50 Albums of 2004
 * New Zealand Top 50 Albums of 2005
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:05, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - the top accumulates sales/play over a year is actually more significant than weeks spent at #1. Remember, WP:NOTPAPER and the absence of articles for other countries may reflect a lack of sources or a lack of human resources. Since there's not much value in inter-year comparisons, I would say that List of year-end number-one singles (New Zealand) is the pointless article. dramatic (talk) 19:34, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't locate the template for linking to previous deletion discussions, but all these pages have been nominated and kept previously. dramatic (talk) 19:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Nomination is based entirely on I DON'T LIKE IT and OTHER STUFF DOESN'T EXIST grounds. New Zealand is an English-speaking country, it has record charts, ergo this is appropriate and notable, regardless of whether or not it is "needed" or whether there are or are not similar lists for other countries. Carrite (talk) 03:25, 30 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. I've found other similar articles, making your point not valid: Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 2001, etc, List of Top 25 singles for 2001 in Australia. Alecsdaniel (talk) 14:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.